MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2438022564 · doi:10.1101/059881

BlastPhyMe: A toolkit for rapid generation and analysis of protein-coding sequence datasets

2016· preprint· en· W2438022564 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan K. Schott, Dr Elizabeth. Gow, Belinda S. W. Chang

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGenBankCoding (social sciences)Data miningGraphical user interfaceReplicatePhylogenetic treeSelection (genetic algorithm)VisualizationArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bstract S ummary We present BlastPhyMe (BLAST, Phylogenies, and Molecular Evolution) a new application to facilitate the fast and easy generation and analysis of protein-coding sequence datasets. The application uses a portable database framework to manage and organize sequences along with a graphical user interface (GUI) that makes the application extremely easy to use. BlastPhyMe utilizes several existing services and applications in a unique way that save researchers considerable time when building and analyzing protein-coding datasets. The application consists of two modules that can be used separately or together. The first module enables the assembly of coding sequence datasets. BLAST searches can be used to obtain all related sequences of interest from NCBI. Full GenBank records are saved within the database and coding sequences are automatically extracted. A feature of particular note is that sequences can be sorted based on NCBI taxonomic hierarchy before export for visualization using existing tools, such as fast. The application provides GUIs for automatic alignment of sequences with the popular tools MUSCLE and PRANK, as well as for reconstructing phylogenetic trees using PhyML. The second module incorporates selection analyses using codon-based likelihood methods. The alignments and phylogenetic trees generated with the dataset module, or those generated elsewhere, can be used to run the models implemented in the codeml PAML package. A GUI allows easy selection of models and parameters. Importantly, replicate analyses with different parameter starting values can be automatically performed in order to ensure selection of the best-fitting model. Multiple analyses can be run simultaneously based on the number of processor cores available, while additional analyses will be run iteratively until completed. Results are saved within the database and can be exported to publication-ready Excel tables, which further automatically compute the appropriate likelihood ratio test between models in order to determine statistical significance. Future updates will add additional options for phylogenetic reconstruction (eg, MrBayes) and selection analyses (eg, HYPHY). BlastPhyMe saves researches of all bioinformatics experience levels considerable time by automating the numerous tasks required for the generation and analysis of protein-coding sequence datasets using a straightforward graphical interface. A vailability Installation package and source code available from: https://github.com/ryankschott/BlastPhyMe C ontact schottr@si.edu

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0060.007
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→