MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2441124910 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2016.196

P.094 Modified Obwegeser temporal approach to the infratemporal fossa: four cases and review of literature

2016· article· en· W2441124910 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wang Bh, Rebecca Woodford, J.E. Armstrong, SP Lownie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfratemporal fossaMedicineSurgeryOtorhinolaryngologyNeurosurgerySkullTemporalis muscleChordomaCondyleTemporal bone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The infratemporal fossa is an anatomically complex region. Lesions that arise in the infratemporal fossa are uncommon; however, their surgical resection remain challenging. Here we present a modified preauricular subtemporal approach initially described by Obwegeser et al. used in four patients with large skull base lesions. Methods: Retrospective case series of 4 patients Results: Four patients with various lesions of the infratemporal fossa (aneurysmal bone cyst, giant cell tumor of the bone, recurrent melanoma and recurrent clival chordoma) underwent surgical resection using the modified Obwegeser approach. A multidisciplinary team cared for patients consisting of maxillofacial surgery, otolaryngology and neurosurgery. After either nasotracheal intubation or tracheostomy, the patient’s jaw was temporarily wired shut. A curvilinear incision was fashioned and the root of zygoma was exposed (masseter attached) and osteotomized followed by inferior mobilization. The mandibular condyle is osteomized next and TMJ disarticulated with temporalis muscle still attached and reflected superiorly. Surgical resection of tumor then proceeded centered around the region bridging the temporal and infratemporal fossae. Reconstruction was carried out using plates and screws. Conclusions: The modified Obwegeser approach can provide safe and direct access to certain infratemporal fossa lesions with good cosmesis and functional outcome for patients without substantially increasing OR time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207