MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W244182435

Elspeth Cameron, Ed. Multiculturalism and Immigration in Canada: An Introductory Reader

2007· article· en· W244182435 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
James Whidden

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismImmigrationIdeologySociologyGender studiesPower (physics)Theme (computing)Media studiesLawPolitical sciencePolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elspeth Cameron, ed. Multiculturalism and Immigration in Canada: An Introductory Reader. xxiv, 426 pp. Toronto: Scholar's Press, 2004. $49.95 sc. Elspeth Cameron introduces Multiculturalism and Immigration in Canada by noting that multiculturalism is an ideology with a complex meaning and an equally complicated history and is variously described as an instrument of state power and local empowerment. This edited volume pulls together such contradictory interpretations to diagnose all the rich diversity of society. The book is divided into sections on Theory, Experience, and Documents and Tables. The first two sections cover multicultural policy and representative voices from diverse communities. There are short excerpts from landmark texts on multiculturalism such as the Report of the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism and John Porter's The Vertical Mosaic. The organization is partly historical, with the early sections indicating that racial ideologies underpinned Canada's immigration policies before 1962. The selections illuminate the way a hierarchy of ethnic groups placed French Canadians and Native Canadians on the lower rungs of the social ladder. Asian and African groups fared hardly better. The last section includes summaries of Canada's ethnic composition alongside Pierre Trudeau's public policy statement of 1971 and the Canadian Multicultural Act, 1985. In short, this publication can hardly fail as a comprehensive guide to the subject for undergraduates. A common theme is the social adjustments forced upon immigrants by the culture. In the first three-quarters of the twentieth century the basic model of immigration for policy makers and academics was the assimilation and acculturation of ethnic groups into a society defined by Anglo-conformity and Franco-conformity. Assimilation created generational conflicts within the immigrant communities as second generation immigrants made adjustments which were anathema to parents clinging to the value systems of their countries of origin. Subsequent selections dealing with the period after 1971 indicate that although multicultural policy might have been designed as a corrective to racial ideologies and ethnic inequalities, Canada has not necessarily become a more tolerant society. Arguably, the dominant value system in Canada continues to suppress the expression of cultural diversity, at least according to Daniel Stoffman's discussion of the illusion of diversity. This is reflected in contemporary debates in the popular media concerning the compatibility of Islam and liberalism. Therefore, this volume ties into recent public debates on whether the rights of diverse cultural groups are safeguarded by secular, liberal values or if liberalism conflicts with cultural diversity. In the post 9/11 world there is a fear that multicultural policies increase cultural or ethnic tensions. Following a contrary line of thought, Stoffman suggests that multicultural policies hold out the promise of tolerance and acceptance only for new immigrants to be suppressed and marginalized in a historically familiar way. In an interesting discussion of the East Asian communities in Vancouver, he points to the emergence of a minority culture that in its rapid growth challenges the majority culture, citing for example dog-eating mainland Chinese confounding dog-loving Canadians. These sorts of discussions beg a better understanding of immigrant experience, moving beyond the old paradigms of assimilation and acculturation. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207