MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2442181867 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now073.67

HG-71ULTRA-SENSITIVE DETECTION OF HOTSPOT MUTATIONS IN PEDIATRIC THALAMIC TUMOURS TO REVEAL NEGATIVE PROGNOSTIC MARKERS

2016· article· en· W2442181867 on OpenAlexaff
Scott Ryall, Anthony Arnoldo, Pawel Buczkowicz, Matthew Mistry, Rahul Krishnatry, Josh Rubin, Paul Steinbok, Uri Tabori, Cynthia Hawkins

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenBC Children's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHotspot (geology)BiologyMedicineComputational biologyGeneticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pediatric gliomas are the most commonly diagnosed brain cancer in children. Despite accounting for only 5% of pediatric brain neoplasms, gliomas arising in the thalamus present a significant challenge for treating physicians. We collected a population-based cohort of 66 radiologically confirmed thalamic tumours with long-term follow-up. No bi-thalamic cases were included. On central review, the cohort consisted of 43 low grade astrocytomas (LGA) and 23 high grade astrocytomas (HGA). Genomic alterations were characterized using newly optimized digital droplet and nanoString assays. Five (12%) LGAs and eleven (48%) HGAs tested positive for H3-K27M. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly worse survival of thalamic glioma patients harbouring the H3-K27M mutation versus wild type samples (log rank p < 0.001) with a median survival of 1.02 vs. 9.12 years, respectively. When separated by histologic grade, H3-K27M status remained a prognostic marker in LGA (p < 0.0001), but failed to maintain statistical significance in the HGA cohort (p = 0.0599). BRAF-V600E and BRAF-Fusion events were detected in 10 and 14 patients respectively. Interestingly, tumours with BRAF-fusion events showed robust survival, with no patients succumbing to their disease (median follow-up 11.5 years). Multivariate analysis demonstrated H3-K27M status and histology to be the most significant predictors of survival with hazard ratios of 8.7 and 12.7 (P < 0.001), respectively. This work substantiates the need for H3-K27M testing in conjunction with histological grading in dictating appropriate diagnosis. Further, we show that low grade malignancies harbouring H3-K27M mutations represent a newly identified subset of thalamic tumours with a unique survival pattern when compared to low grade H3-WT cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→