Bibliographic record
Abstract
T he Montreal Declaration: People's Right to Safety is a timely declaration that recognizes the increasing magnitude, devastating consequences, and structural antecedents of violent injuries internationally. It provides an additional impetus for the safety-promotion sector to address the physical, psychosocial, cultural, and economic conditions that have a fundamental impact on safety, especially within low-income contexts, and to facilitate the recognition of safety as a basic human right. Moreover, the Declaration directs the promotion of safety and other sectors toward consciously tackling armed confliets, human security, and development of sustainable livelihoods throughout Africa, with specific focus on marginalized groups, minorities, women, and children. This is particularly important, given that, by 2020, wars, civil conflicts, and interpersonal violence are expected to account for a significant proportion of injury, morbidity, and mortality in Africa. ' Similar to many existing international human rightsbased documents, the Montreal Declaration raises important possibilities for coalescing the promotion of safety with a range of other human rights on common, international goals. It offers the potential to engage in universal criteria that extend beyond safety as it is embodied implicitly in civil liberties-the right to bodily integrity and the right to social stability-to generate a minimum gold standard for safety in and of itself. In this regard, the Declaration is a
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".