<i>In vivo</i> regulation of integrin turnover by outside-in activation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of three-dimensional tissue architecture requires precise control over the attachment of cells to the extracellular matrix (ECM). Integrins, the main ECM-binding receptors in animals, are regulated in multiple ways to modulate cell-ECM adhesion. One example is the conformational activation of integrins by extracellular signals ('outside-in activation') or by intracellular signals ('inside-out activation'), whereas another is the modulation of integrin turnover. We demonstrate that outside-in activation regulates integrin turnover to stabilize tissue architecture in vivo Treating Drosophila embryos with Mg(2+) and Mn(2+), known to induce outside-in activation, resulted in decreased integrin turnover. Mathematical modeling combined with mutational analysis provides mechanistic insight into the stabilization of integrins at the membrane. We show that as tissues mature, outside-in activation is crucial for regulating the stabilization of integrin-mediated adhesions. This data identifies a new in vivo role for outside-in activation and sheds light on the key transition between tissue morphogenesis and maintenance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".