MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W245051354

ADAPTACIÓN CULTURAL Y PSICOMÉTRICA DE LA ESCALA DE MOTIVACIÓN ACADÉMICA. UN ESTUDIO PILOTO

2004· article· es· W245051354 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Buenos Aires, Alejandra Montané López, Rubén Ledesma

Bibliographic record

VenueXI Jornadas de Investigación · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Outcomes and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyDeci-PhilosophyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Academic Motivation Scale – Escala de Motivacion Academica- fue creada por Robert Valerand en 1989 con el objeto de identificar estilos reguladores de motivacion en contextos academicos. Esta escala fue validada con estudiantes Franceses y Canadienses y sus postulados obedecen a la Teoria de la Autorregulacion propuesta por Deci y Ryann (1985). La version original de esta escala permite determinar siete factores: tres que corresponden a motivacion extrinseca (regulacion externa, regulacion introyectada y regulacion identificada); tres que corresponden a motivacion intrinseca (conocimiento, realizacion y estimulo) y uno que corresponde a desmotivacion. En este trabajo se presentan resultados preliminares de una adaptacion cultural y psicometrica de la Escala de Motivacion Academica. Participan del estudio 50 alumnos de la facultad de Psicologia de la Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, que cursan materias comprendidas entre segundo y quinto ano de la carrera, la muestra fue casual, los resultados obtenidos arrojan evidencia a favor de la validez de constructo y de la fiabilidad de la escala propuesta. Resumen en Ingles The Academic Motivation Scale was created by Robert Valerand in 1989 with the intention of identifying regulating styles of motivation in academic contexts. This scale was validated with French and Canadian students and their postulates obey to the Self-regulation Theory propose by Deci and Ryann (1985). The original version of this scale allows to determine seven factors: three that corresponds to extrinsic motivation (external regulation, introyectada regulation and identified regulation); three that corresponds to intrinsic motivation (knowledge, accomplishment and stimulus) and one that corresponds to amotivation. In this work the preliminary results of the cultural and psicometric adaptation of the Scale Academic Motivation. Participants are 50 undergraduate student of the Faculty of Psychology of the National University of Mar del Plata, who attend matters between second and fifth year of the career. The sample was accidental. Finally, the preliminary results provide evidence about the factorial validity and the reliability of present the scale. Palabras Clave Motivacion EMA Teoria Autodeterminacion

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueXI Jornadas de InvestigaciónSame topicEducational Outcomes and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207