Influence of Supramolecular Interaction Type on Photoresponsive Azopolymer Complexes: A Surface Relief Grating Formation Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of the supramolecular interaction type—hydrogen bonding, proton transfer, and pure ionic bonding—on photoresponsive behavior, particularly surface relief grating (SRG) inscription, has been investigated using a homopolymer with an ambient temperature glass transition ( T g ). To this end, poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA or PDM) of relatively high molecular weight (42K) was complexed at various azo/DM molar ratios with dimethylaminoazobenzene derivatives functionalized by hydroxyl (azoOH) or carboxylic acid ( p -methyl red or azoCOOH) groups, and quaternized PDM (PDMQ) was complexed at equimolar ratio with a sulfonated analogue (methyl orange or azoSO 3 ), and the structural and thermal properties of these complexes were determined. SRG inscription on spin-coated films was found to be possible because complexation increases the T g above ambient. The efficiency of SRG inscription on spin-coated films, which increases with azo content, is highest for the purely ionic azoSO 3 /PDMQ complex despite its very high T g, while the proton transfer azoCOOH/PDM complexes, involving ionic and H-bonding with acid-salt structures, show somewhat more efficient SRG inscription than do the purely hydrogen-bonded azoOH/PDM complexes, and this despite some azoCOOH crystallization at the highest molar ratios. These findings clarify the comparative effectiveness of different supramolecular bond types on SRG inscription and provide a useful guide for the design of supramolecular photoresponsive polymers for SRG applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".