MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2460473130

Neither with Them, nor without Them: The Russian Writer and the Jew in the Age of Realism

2009· article· en· W2460473130 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Myroslav Shkandrij

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealismFolkloreAntisemitismLiteraturePoliticsNationalismHistoryRussian literatureReligious studiesPhilosophyArtLawJudaismTheologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elena M. Katz. Neither with Them, Nor Without Them: The Russian Writer and the Jew in the Age of Realism. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2008. 366 pp. Bibliography. Index. $29.95, cloth.Russian writers contributed to the creation of the image of the Jew as Other in imperial culture. Katz focuses on three iconic figures in the defining period of 1830-1880: Gogol' Dostoevskii, and Turgenev. She argues that the first saw them through folkloric images of Jews, the second through a zealous nationalism, and the third through a pro- Western and cosmopolitan orientation. The fiction is examined alongside the essays and correspondence of each author, and these are related to wider public and political pronouncements. The result is a richly textured account with many insights into the literature and society's view of Jews.Previous readings have often condemned the writers as anti-Semitic or have defined them in blunt terms as either sympathetic or antipathetic toward Jews. Katz tends to use the term Judeophobia, which implies a religious rather than racial rejection. Since antiSemitism as a racial category only appeared during the 1 870s, largely as an import from the West, she considers it less applicable. She also finds the term allophobia (a fear of the Other) more appropriate in describing some imperial and nationalistic attitudes. Another level of complexity is posed by each author's evolution. Gogol' accepted Jews as part of the cultural landscape but showed little interest in them, especially later in life. Dostoevskii's zealotry, on the other hand, turned him into a Judeophobe and anti-Semite toward the end of his life. However, this evolution is less evident in his fiction, which is dominated by a fear and contempt for all things foreign. His Russian messianism was related to his attacks on the individualism, capitalism and liberalism of which the West and Jews were guilty. Katz describes his views as blending old stereotypes with modern myths of degeneracy. Her analysis demonstrates how the literary Jew was also a product of this process of self-definition.Turgenev emerges as a refreshing foil to Dostoevskii. An enlightened, humanitarian, and European writer, he did much to demythologize the literary Jew and Jewess, as his Unhappy Girl (1869) demonstrates. For Turgenev, Europe represented modernity and moderation that Russia needed. His construct of the Jew included positive features. However, the writer did not publicly condemn the growing anti-Semitism of the 1870s or pogroms of the early 1880s.Katz shows sensitivity to often ignored distinctions between the terms Rus', Russia, and Ukraine, but her discussion of Gogol s Taras Bul'ba fails to explain the historical context accurately. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.833

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207