MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2460480177 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2015.08.007

P4‐179: Young to middle‐aged dogs with high basal Aβ42 CSF level demonstrate learning impairment compared to dogs with low basal CSF Aβ42

2015· article· en· W2460480177 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph A. Araujo, Herman Borghys, Melissa Brooks, Bianca Van Broeck, Deborah Dhuyvetter

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsNutreco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasal (medicine)BeagleCerebrospinal fluidAtrophyPsychologyBiomarkerCognitionInternal medicineMedicinePathologyPhysiologyEndocrinologyNeuroscienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aged dogs naturally demonstrate several features of Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression including domain-specific cognitive decline and brain pathology, such as amyloid deposition, cerebral atrophy and neuronal loss. Moreover, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of Aβ42 decrease from middle- to old-age in dogs, and this decrease is inversely correlated with brain amyloid load. Therefore, CSF levels of Aβ may provide a translational endpoint for therapeutic studies. This current study assessed the effect of CSF Aβ42 basal levels in young to middle aged dogs on measures of learning. Twenty young to middle-aged Beagle dogs (2-8 years) were divided into a group demonstrating high (N=10) or low (N=10) basal CSF Aβ42 levels from a larger colony in which basal CSF Aβ42 level was determined as the mean levels from multiple CSF samples collected from the lateral ventricle over several years. The dogs underwent cognitive testing using standardized cognitive tests previously described, including reward approach learning, object approach learning, object discrimination learning and object discrimination reversal learning. Group differences were assessed using independent t-tests. No age differences were noted between the two groups. Similarly, no group differences on reward and object approach were detected. However, the high basal Aβ42 group committed significantly (p<0.01) more errors on the object discrimination learning than the low Aβ42 group. Moreover, subjects in the low Aβ42 group completed reversal learning more rapidly than subjects in the high basal Aβ42 group. Results of ongoing cognitive testing and additional biomarker analysis will be reported. In combination with previous data indicating that no or minimal amyloid plaque deposition is expected in young to middle aged dogs, the current data suggest that high basal Aβ42 CSF level is associated with learning impairments likely prior to amyloid plaque deposition. This finding in the naturalistic canine model of Alzheimer's disease progression warrants the further examination of causal links between high CSF levels of Aβ42 and cognitive impairment prior to amyloid deposition in the progression of AD pathophysiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207