MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2460664335 · doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.265.2.8

Epitypification, emendation and synonymy of Lecanorchis taiwaniana (Vanilleae, Vanilloideae, Orchidaceae)

2016· article· en· W2460664335 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kenji Suetsugu, Tian‐Chuan Hsu, Hirokazu Fukunaga, Shinichiro Sawa

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytotaxa · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTerry Fox Research Institute
KeywordsPerianthOrchidaceaeBiologyGenusKey (lock)Taxonomy (biology)BotanyZoologyOvaryIdentification keyEcologyPollen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genus Lecanorchis Blume (1856: 188) comprises a group of mycoheterotrophic species that grow in multiple clusters with an erect, branched or unbranched stem (Hashimoto 1990, Sawa et al. 2006, Seidenfaden 1978, Szlachetko & Mytnik 2000). The key characteristic of the species of Lecanorchis is the presence of a calyculus, a cup-like structure between the base of the perianth and the apex of the ovary (Cameron 2003, Hashimoto 1990, Sawa et al. 2006). There are about thirty species and/or varieties in the genus Lecanorchis extending across a large geographical area that includes Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Japan, and New Guinea (Hashimoto 1990, Seidenfaden 1978, Su 2000, Szlachetko & Mytnik 2000, Cameron 2003, Averyanov 2011). Precise identification of the Lecanorchis species is often difficult due to close similarities in morphology and the short durations of flowering periods (Hashimoto 1990, Averyanov 2005, Suddee & Pedersen 2011, Tsukaya & Okada 2013). Furthermore, detailed descriptions are lacking for some species, particularly those described in decades past. Given such difficulties in precise identification, adequate taxonomic studies of this genus have not been conducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytotaxaSame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207