MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2460709528 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n11p119

Effect of family centered empowerment model on hemodialysis patients and their caregivers

2016· article· en· W2460709528 on OpenAlex
Omebrahiem A. El-Melegy, Amaal M. Al-Zeftawy, Samia E. Khaton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTanta University
KeywordsEmpowermentAutonomyIntervention (counseling)HemodialysisMedicinePsychologyTest (biology)NursingPhysical therapyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background : Hemodialysis is a prolonged process that affects all life aspects of the patient and his family including the physiological, psychological, functional ability, and lifestyle changes. The aim of this study was as to evaluate the effect of family centered empowerment model on hemodialysis patients and their caregivers. Methods : Quasi experimental design was used in this study. This study was conducted in dialysis unit in Tanta University Hospital. Fifty hemodialysis patients and fifty caregivers attending the previous setting were included in the study. Tools of the study: Five tools were used in this study; Pre-test data were obtained by using two socio-demographic data form for patients and caregivers and three questionnaires tools for self-efficacy and burden level. Empowerment intervention was given to the studied subjects then post test data was collected. Results : The majority of the studied subjects obtained low score level of self-efficacy in relation to (autonomy, self - integration, problem solving ability and seeking social support category) pre-empowerment intervention, while post empowerment, none of them fall in the same category and more than two thirds of them had high score regarding level of autonomy, level of self integration and problem solving ability. Most caregivers have low self efficacy pre empowerment. While post empowerment, more than two thirds and nearly one third of them fall in moderate and high level respectively. All caregivers obtained severe burden level pre empowerment while post empowerment 66% falls in mild to moderate level. Conclusions and recommendation : Empowerment of hemodialysis patients and their caregivers can assist them with the management of health-related problems and improve their self efficacy and decrease the burden level of the caregivers so the study recommended that before the beginning of dialysis therapy, health professionals should identify and explore patient needs and potential caregiver in the family of patient and established empowerment programs to prepare them for the task to be carried out, mainly in the initial phase of their activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it