Bibliographic record
Abstract
D. Berbrayer: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships To Disclose. What are the barriers to mobility as it relates to limiting employment of adult Cerebral Palsy? This qualitative study involved a 30 minute structured interview of patients randomized by a nursing coordinator attending an outpatient adult rehabilitation clinic at a university teaching centre. Individuals with severe cognitive impairment were excluded. The interview was open ended and allowed the subjects to undergo self-reflection. Themes and patterns were identified. Adult Cerebral Palsy were employed either full time or major part time (> 3 days /week). Academic university hospital 10 adults (> 18years) with spastic cerebral palsy-5 female, 5 male. Qualitative structure open ended questions in 30 minute interview with allowance for reflection. Exclusion: Adult Cerebral Palsy with severe cognitive disability and associated language barriers. Qualitative open ended questionnaire for 30 minutes and further 10 minutes for reflection. Answers were recorded with permission from Adult Cerebral Palsy. Questions were reviewed by the Institutional Review Board and approved for study. Transportation was a recurrent theme with delays in handicap transport and lack of accessible parking near the site of employment. At the site of employment, there were identified difficulties with ease of entering and exiting the bathroom. There was difficulty for the elevator to accommodate a scooter or a powered/manual wheelchair. There were accessibility issues with respect to the size of the work cubicle and the entrance to the work site was limited by the type of door handle- push/lever and weight of the door. Push buttons and elevator delays or breakdowns created barriers. Use of telephone or computers was difficult. During lunch hour there was insufficient time to eat the food and difficulty to access fridge or microwave. Availability and maintenance of accessibility devices and services are recurring as barriers to one's mobility when considering employment or volunteer opportunities. Physiatrists have a role in education of employers about barrier needs and ensuring environment can accommodate adult cerebral palsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".