Training ANFIS Using the Enhanced Bees Algorithm and Least Squares Estimation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractThis paper presents the result of research in developing a novel training model for Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS). ANFIS integrates the learning ability of Artificial Neural Networks with the Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Inference System to approximate nonlinear functions. Therefore, it is considered as a Universal Estimator. The original algorithm used in ANFIS training process has a hybrid model that uses Steepest Decent Derivative; therefore, it inherits low convergence rate and local minima during training. In this study, a training algorithm is proposed that combines Bees Algorithm (BA) and Least Square Estimation (LSE) (BA-LSE). The local and global exploration of BA as integrates with the best-fit solution of the LSE improves current shortcomings of ANFIS training process. The proposed training algorithm is examined under three different scenarios of function approximation, time series prediction, and classification experiments in order to verify the promising improvements in the tr...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it