The Coulon deposit: quantifying alteration in volcanogenic massive sulphide systems modified by amphibolite-facies metamorphism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Coulon deposit is a volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) system in the James Bay area, Superior craton, Quebec, that was metamorphosed to amphibolite-facies conditions. The chemistry and mineralogy of the VMS-related alteration halo proximal to the mineralized sulphide lenses are investigated, using samples collected in the field and 5583 chemical analyses provided by Osisko Ltd. Alteration is quantified using mass balance and normative calculations, and the application and performance of these methods in an exploration context are investigated. In VMS systems, altered rocks proximal to the ore zones are characterized by multi-element metasomatism, which is best quantified by mass balance methods that have been successfully applied in the study area. However, mass balance calculations necessitate the documentation of a precursor, which is not always possible in an exploration context; therefore, an alternative method (i.e., alteration indices) was also evaluated. In most VMS systems, proximal alteration is characterized by chlorite (chloritization), muscovite (sericitization), and quartz (silicification), while at the Coulon deposit, altered rocks contain mostly cordierite, biotite, sillimanite, and quartz. Alteration indices were calculated using observed and normative minerals, and provide satisfactory results similar to those obtained with mass balance calculations. Using these results, recommendations are made to estimate the intensity of alteration in the core shack using the proportions of observed minerals. Alteration indices are sensitive to the composition of precursors; and because of high-grade metamorphism, chloritization and sericitization are not precisely quantified. Recognizing these limitations is essential to successful quantification of alteration in areas metamorphosed to high-grade conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".