MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Foreword

2011· article· en· W2461056870 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anthony Falconer

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSri lankaWorkforceMillennium Development GoalsChatterjeePopulationEconomic growthSouth asiaPolitical scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)Work (physics)Developing countryFace (sociological concept)PovertyGeographyDevelopment economicsSociologySocial scienceEngineeringDemographyEthnologyLawBengali

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), based in London, has a global membership of over 12 000 specialists, nearly 6000 of whom work outside the UK.In recent years, RCOG has felt a major responsibility, together with other partners, including the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, to assist our colleagues working in low-and middle-income countries to face up to the challenges outlined in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 4 and 5.We enjoy particular warmth with our global colleagues and those working within Asia.Some years ago, Professor Chatterjee proposed the idea of hosting a South Asia day, to be held here at RCOG in London, which would incorporate experts from Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and his own country of India, to share ideas on resolving strategies for MDGs 4 and 5.This supplement represents a synopsis of a remarkable day, and I am very grateful to Nynke van den Broek and Devender Roberts for their initiative in editing this remarkable supplement, which should act as a significant resource to those engaged in this area.These five countries represent one-quarter of the global population.They share similar challenges of difficulty of rural access, poor transport, a limited workforce, limited skills and resources and, sadly, for two of these countries, conflict has been a contemporary problem (Pakistan and Sri Lanka).However, in other ways, they are remarkably different: Sri Lanka being an island in which almost all people enjoy easy access to hospitals, Nepal containing the highest mountains in the world where access to facilities is challenging.Some of these countries have major challenges with education and empowerment of women.Poverty is still a problem for many population groups in these countries, even though there is huge economic development in this region.Sri Lanka, the smallest country of the five, is often applauded as a role model in organising maternity services for other under-resourced countries.With a population of 20 million, the current estimated maternal mortality ratio (MMR) per 100 000 live births in Sri Lanka is 39, a figure that many countries would envy.Professor Senanayake points out that strong political commitment to public health and midwives, together with a realisation of free health care and free education for all, are major

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5480.509

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologySame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207