MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2461751476 · doi:10.3808/jei.201600329

Sorption of Phenanthrene onto Diatomite under the Influences of Solution Chemistry: A Study of Linear Sorption based on Maximal Information Coefficient

2016· article· en· W2461751476 on OpenAlexaff
Shan Zhao, Wendy Huang, Xiuquan Wang, Yurui Fan, Chunjiang An

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Informatics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSorptionPhenanthreneAqueous solutionSorbentChemistryIonic strengthFreundlich equationPartition coefficientEnvironmental chemistryChemical engineeringAdsorptionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effectiveness of diatomite as the low-cost sorbent in the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from water was investigated. The effects of ionic strength, pH, dissolved organic matter, and temperature on sorption of phenanthrene (PHE) to two types of diatomite clay (DM 545 and DM 577) were systematically studied. The maximal information coefficient (MIC) was calculated to reveal the linearity/nonlinearity in the sorption process under the influences of aqueous chemistry parameters. Results indicated that the solution parameters played an essential role in the PHE sorption behavior at the aqueous/diatomite interface. The sorption isotherms of PHE on diatomite at different temperatures could well fit the Freundlich equation. Thermodynamic studies confirmed that the sorption behavior of PHE on diatomite was spontaneous and exothermic from 283 to 303 K. The calculation of MIC revealed the linear relationship between the aqueous PAHs and sorbed PAHs at the water/diatomite interface. The results can be used to support the potential application of diatomite for the treatment of PAH-contaminated effluents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental InformaticsSame topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207