MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2462001934 · doi:10.1021/bk-2009-1005.ch010

Understanding Climatic Effects of Aerosols: Modeling Radiative Effects of Aerosols

2009· book-chapter· en· W2462001934 on OpenAlexaff
Tarek Ayash, Sunling Gong, Charles Q. Jia

Bibliographic record

VenueACS symposium series · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesRadiative transferAerosolClimatologyMeteorologyGeographyPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate on the Earth is a highly dynamic and complex system in which aerosols have been increasingly recognized as a key component. While the production, transport and fate of aerosols are fundamentally determined by the elements of climate, such as wind and and precipitation, aerosols may affect the Earth's climate through complex processes of absorbing and reflecting the incoming solar and the outgoing terrestrial radiation, and indirectly affecting solar and terrestrial radiation by changing the properties of clouds, in addition to participating in heterogeneous reactions that affect key atmospheric constituents. Due to inherent complexities, coupled with modeling limitations, quantifying the aerosols' climate effects is still highly uncertain and, thus, presents a challenging aspect of climate research. In this chapter, the elements of arosol-climate interactions and the uncertainties underlying aerosol-climate modeling are reviewed. Climatic implications of radiative forcing are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS symposium seriesSame topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207