O programa sala de leitura e seus reflexos nas histórias de leitura de alunos e professores de uma escola estadual paulista
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is an investigation about the relations between the Room to Read Project, introduced by the state government in a state school in the countryside of the state of São Paulo in 2009, and the reading background of the teachers responsible for the Room as a reading mediator, and the reading background of three students chosen by those teachers due to the frequency they attend this Room. By analyzing qualitative data, we tried to understand how the Room to Read works, and the profile of this school community was studied considering the formation of its cultural identity and relating it with the reading as a cultural product. In order to carry out this investigation, interactions were made by means of interviews recorded with the teachers responsible for the Room to Read and with the chosen students. The interviews were analyzed, qualitatively investigating the participant's reading stories and experiences, and based on the theoretical and methodological approaches of Clandinin and Connelly's (2011) narrative research. In order to understand what those Canadian authors refer to, we relied on Gadamer's (1997) philosophical hermeneutics, trying to analyze how much of those reading experiences can be (or cannot be) related to the frequency the students go to Room to Read during the daily school routine and how those experiences help (or do not help) their identity formation within the school. We also relied on Soares's (2006; 2010) and Kleiman's (2010) studies on literacy, on anthropologist Michèle Petit's (2008; 2010) records about reading experiences, and on Roger Chartier's (1996; 1999) contributions related to reading, books and cultural practices, which are in line with Lipovetsky and Serroy's (2011) world-culture approach. Regarding identity formation and its relation with the reading role, we relied on Bauman's (2005) e Hall's (2011; 2013) work concerning identity...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".