MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2462453154

Extractivismo minero en Latinoamérica, principal activo de la deuda ecológica

2015· article· es· W2462453154 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aleida Azamar Alonso

Bibliographic record

VenueXI Jornadas de Sociología · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La mineria es una actividad elemental en Latinoamerica por la trascendencia que ha tenido en el proceso productivo a lo largo de la historia. El permanente interes que los capitales ejercen en la explotacion intensiva de los bienes naturales esta supeditado a la demanda de dichos bienes por medio de las naciones desarrolladas para el consumo de su industria. Por otro lado, Latinoamerica no ha logrado un desarrollo economico notable desde la decada de los noventa, momento en el que se facilito la entrada a capitales extranjeros, pues el aumento de la Inversion Extranjera Directa (IED) en proyectos extractivos -principalmente mineros- ha crecido de manera paralela al incremento de la deuda externa que presenta el Continente. Debido a lo anterior, se considera que existe una deuda ecologica entre las naciones desarrolladas y subdesarrolladas, por lo que el presente trabajo estudiara la deuda que sostienen Estados Unidos y Canada con Mexico debido a la intensa actividad extractiva que los primeros mantienen con nuestro pais. Analizaremos los flujos de materias primas, la medicion de la biocapacidad y la huella ecologica en Mexico, con la finalidad de demostrar la trasferencia de los danos que provocan estas actividades como parte elemental de la deuda.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueXI Jornadas de SociologíaSame topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207