Harold Innis in the New Century: Reflections and Refractions. (Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Charles R. Acland and William J. Buxton, eds, Harold Innis in the New Century: and Refractions. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1999, 435 pp. Harold Innis in the New Century is a collection of twenty essays that were originally presented at a conference at Concordia University celebrating the 1994 centenary of Harold Innis's birth. The contributors were selected to represent a diversity of engagements and engagement sites. Yet, the book reads as an integrated whole--in part because the contributors share a common focus on Innis as a public intellectual and in part because they share a model of historiography that restores Innis's writings to their context while allowing contributors to use their reflections on Innis to explore the place of intellectual practice in the twenty-first century. Read in this way, the of Innis becomes less like a repository to be mined for ideas than a theoretical shunting point for refracting and juxtaposing various perspectives (p. 25). Like Innis before them, the contributors to this collection reflect on the impact of ideas produced by academics on social and cultural transformation. And, like those of these reflections must be read against the backdrop of the very different intellectual and social contexts in which they were written. It is no surprise, then, that this reflection on Innis's legacy challenges past interpretations, including the view that his most lasting legacy would be his work on political economy and economic history, especially Canadian economic history (e.g., The Fur Trade in Canada: An Introduction to Canadian Economic History, The Cod Fisheries: The History of an International Economy) and the early Innis/late Innis approach to understanding his intellectual legacy that privileges discontinuities over continuities. In their place this book offers an assessment of the meaning and relevance of Innis's writings for today's world that highlights his concern with the role of the intellectual in the crisis of co ntemporary culture. By focusing attention on Innis's understanding of connections among the intellectual, culture, communications, monopolies of knowledge, and intellectual present-mindedness, these essays accomplish the two goals set out in the book's subtitle: They detail how Innis influenced intellectual practice and organization in Canada and they identify key points where his ideas, appropriately extended, continue to engage intellectuals and social activists. The book is divided into three parts. The eight essays of Part One, Reflections on Innis, examine the development of his thought, the changing climate for the reception of his ideas, and his approach to intellectual practice. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".