A review of species of the genus Oobius Trjapitzin, 1963 (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae)—Egg parasitoids of jewel beetles, longicorn beetles (Coleoptera, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae), and robber flies (Diptera, Asilidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The review contains diagnosis of the genus Oobius Trjapitzin, 1963 (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae), a key to the females of its 9 species described in the world fauna, and synopsis of the species with data on their distribution and hosts. Special attention is paid to an economically important species, Oobius agrili Zhang et Wang, 2005, introduced from China into USA and Canada for biological control of the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera, Buprestidae), a very dangerous pest of ashes ( Fraxinus spp.). This buprestid has also recently penetrated into Russia, which necessitates introduction of its egg parasitoid, O. agrili. Coccidencyrtus pinicola Mercet, 1921 from Spain is transferred to the genus Oobius , hence a new combination, O. pinicola (Mercet), comb. n., is proposed. The lectotype of Tyndarichus rudnevi S. Nowicki, 1928 (type species of the genus Oobius ) is designated in the collection of the National Museum of Natural Sciences in Madrid and this is formally fixated in the present review. The material of Oobius has been studied in depositories of St. Petersburg, Warsaw, Madrid, and Monterrey (Mexico).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".