MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2463052218 · doi:10.1002/poc.3582

Density functional theory study of substituent effects on gas‐phase heterolytic Fe–O and Fe–S bond energies of <i>m</i>‐G‐C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>OFe(CO)<sub>2</sub>(η<sup>5</sup>‐C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>) and <i>m</i>‐G‐C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>SFe(CO)<sub>2</sub>(η<sup>5</sup>‐C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)

2016· article· en· W2463052218 on OpenAlexaff
Qing Zeng, Zucheng Li, Yi‐Bo Wang, Huaqiang Zhai, Bin Liu, Ou Tao, Ling Dong, Jun Guan, Yujie Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Organic Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterolysisChemistryCyclopentadienyl complexSubstituentDensity functional theoryAnsatzElectronegativityCrystallographyBond energyGas phaseComputational chemistryPhysical chemistryMedicinal chemistryMoleculeCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The knowledge of accurate bond strengths is a fundamental basis for a proper analysis of chemical reaction mechanisms. Quantum chemical calculations at different levels of theory have been used to investigate heterolytic Fe–O and Fe–S bond energies of (meta‐substituted phenoxy)dicarbonyl(η 5 ‐cyclopentadienyl) iron [ m ‐G‐C 6 H 4 OFp ( 1 )] and (meta‐substituted benzenethiolato)dicarbonyl(η 5 ‐cyclopentadienyl) iron [ m ‐G‐C 6 H 4 SFp ( 2 )] complexes. In this study, Fp is (η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )Fe(CO) 2 , and G is NO 2 , CN, COMe, CO 2 Me, CF 3 , Br, Cl, F, H, Me, MeO, and NMe 2 . The results show that Tao–Perdew–Staroverov–Scuseria and Becke's power‐series ansatz from 1997 with dispersion corrections functionals can provide the best price/performance ratio and accurate predictions of Δ H het (Fe–O)'s and Δ H het (Fe–S)'s. The excellent linear free energy relations [ r = 1.00 (g, 1e), 1.00 (g, 2b)] among the ΔΔ H het (Fe–O)'s and δΔ G 0 of OH bonds of m ‐G‐C 6 H 4 OH or ΔΔ H het (Fe–S)'s and Δp K a 's of SH bonds of m ‐G‐C 6 H 4 SH imply that the governing structural factors for these bond scissions are similar. And, the linear correlations [ r = −0.97 (g, 1 g), −0.97 (g, 2 h)] among the ΔΔ H het (Fe–O)'s or ΔΔ H het (Fe–S)'s and the substituent σ m constants show that these correlations are in accordance with Hammett linear free energy relationships. The inductive effects of these substituents and the basis set effects influence the accuracy of Δ H het (Fe–O)'s or Δ H het (Fe–S)'s. The ΔΔ H het (Fe–O)'s(g) (1) and ΔΔ H het (Fe–S)'s(g)(2) follow the capto‐dative Principle. The substituent effects on the Fe–O bonds are much stronger than those on the less polar Fe–S bonds. Insight from this work may help the design of more effective catalytic processes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0110.011
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.007
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0040.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical Organic ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207