MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intermuscular Differences in Leg Muscle Protein Quality in Human Diabetic Neuropathy

2015· article· en· W2463379171 on OpenAlexaff
Colin W. Moore, Matti D. Allen, Kurt Kimpinsky, Timothy J. Doherty, Charles L. Rice

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineTibialis anterior muscleAnkleMuscle atrophyDenervationDiabetic neuropathySkeletal muscleAnatomyPeripheral neuropathyInternal medicineAtrophyElectromyographyAmyotrophyEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnetization transfer (MT) ratio, derived from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, has been used to non-invasively evaluate pathological changes in the central nervous system. Use of MT imaging has been recently extended to evaluate muscle protein quality in natural adult aging, and in some clinical populations with neuromuscular disease. Peripheral neuropathy due to diabetes is related to loss of strength, motor axon loss, muscle denervation and subsequent atrophy of skeletal muscle. PURPOSE: To assess whether individuals with a diabetic neuropathy (DN) have a reduced muscle protein quality in the flexor and extensor leg muscles compared to age-matched control subjects. METHODS: Using a 3T MR scanner, MT images of the tibialis anterior (TA), soleus (SOL) and gastrocnemius (GA) muscles were recorded from 8 individuals (5 men) with DN (∼60y) and 7 (4 men) age and sex-matched controls. Using image analysis software, a magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) was calculated offline from pairs of images with (MT) and without (M0) an off-resonance prepulse as: [(M0-MT)/M0]. Outside the MR scanner, maximal dorsiflexion strength and voluntary activation were assessed using an ankle joint dynamometer. Absolute maximal dorsiflexion strength was normalized to TA muscle volume in a subset (n=9; 4 DN vs. 5 control) of each group. RESULTS: From MTR calculations, the muscle protein quality of the TA, SOL and GA were significantly reduced (∼13%, ∼5%, ∼5%, respectively) in DN subjects compared to controls. MTR values from an average of all 3 leg muscles were significantly lower in DN subjects (0.28 ± 0.02 vs. 0.30 ± 0.02 p.u.) compared to control. Despite equal voluntary activation abilities, absolute maximal dorsiflexion strength was significantly lower in the DN (∼29%) group. When normalized to muscle tissue volume, dorsiflexion strength was significantly lower in DN (∼34%) compared to control. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to reductions in overall leg muscle protein quality, these findings indicate preferential decline in the structural integrity and contractile quality of the extensor (TA) leg muscles when compared with the flexors (SOL, GA). Thus, for those with DN, muscle weakness may primarily be due to a loss of muscle mass, and reduction of contractile quality per volume of viable muscle tissue. Supported by NSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207