MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2463487238 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.6b00592

Real-Time Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of a Transport–Reaction System

2016· article· en· W2463487238 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Steinboeck, Martin Guay, Andreas Kugi

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersÖsterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
KeywordsModel predictive controlDiscretizationControl theory (sociology)Exothermic reactionNonlinear systemRobustness (evolution)Optimal controlComputer scienceMathematical optimizationContinuous stirred-tank reactorPartial differential equationMathematicsControl (management)EngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two real-time nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) algorithms for a transport–reaction system are designed. The system is modeled by a hyperbolic partial differential equation and discretized by means of a two-time-level semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian scheme. For the resulting lumped-parameter system, a constrained optimal control problem is formulated and state constraints are implemented in the form of barrier functions. The NMPC algorithms perform a single step or several steps of an iterative solution routine of the optimal control problem at every sampling point. With this suboptimal solution strategy, a fixed maximum evaluation time and execution in real time are guaranteed. An analysis of the nominal stability is provided for one NMPC scheme. The robustness of the controllers is evaluated for an example problem, where a nonisothermal plug-flow reactor with irreversible exothermic reactions is considered. The control objectives are to limit the maximum reactor temperature (avoid hot spots) and to maximize the process output.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207