MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Understanding the Constraints of Rural Education for the Conservation of Sea Turtles in La Guajira, Colombia

2011· article· en· W2464030331 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLiteracy Information and Computer Education Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicViolence, Education, and Gender Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFisheryGeographyPolitical scienceOceanographyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Guajira in northern Colombia suggest that local sea turtle populations have declined over the past several years. Possible factors associated with the decline of sea turtles include the Guajiro's view of sea turtle meat as a delicacy, lack of environmental education, ignorance of the law, lack of enforcement of the law, inadequate funding for conservation programs, and the contamination and destruction of local marine and coastal habitats. In recent years, environmental agencies, NGOs and private companies have made efforts working towards sea turtle conservation; however, such initiatives have been largely ineffective. The poor results are a product of the lack of coordination among, investment from, and compromise between CORPOGUAJIRA and the Ministry of the Environment, Housing and Territorial Development. Consequently, the Department of La Guajira has only one ongoing program concerned with sea turtles, one that is generally focused on education but not on conservation. Successful conservation of a threatened species depends in part on long-term and in-depth population studies. This is particularly true of reptiles, which appear to be extraordinarily vulnerable to global climate change and other human-induced stressors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it