MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of Menopause Transition and Physical Activity on Stress Perception

2016· article· en· W2464388446 on OpenAlexaff
Alyssa Biagé, Eva Guérin, Gary Golfield, Éric Doucet, Irène Strychar, Denis Prud’homme

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsMontfort HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenopauseLongitudinal studyBody mass indexPerceived Stress ScalePerceptionPhysical activityPsychologyStress (linguistics)MedicineObservational studyDemographyGerontologyPhysical therapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The transition to menopause is a natural process and a period of significant physical, hormonal and psychological changes that create sources of stress with which women must cope. Lifestyle factors, such as time spent engaging in physical activity of various intensities, may play a role in moderating the psychological impact of menopause. The purpose of this study was to investigate the following two objectives: 1) the longitudinal effect of the transition to menopause on perceived stress, and 2) the association between the volume/intensity of physical activity and stress perceptions during the menopause transition. METHODS: This secondary analysis was performed on on the results obtained of a 5-year observational, longitudinal study on the effects of menopausal transition on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors. The sample at baseline (year 1) consisted of 102 premenopausal women (age, 49.9 ± 1.9 y; body mass index, 23.3 ± 2.2 kg/m2). Time spent in physical activity of varying intensities (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous) was determined using accelerometer measurement over a 7-day period. Stress perception was assessed with Cohen’s Stress Perception Scale consisting of 14 self-reported items. RESULTS: Linear mixed model regression analyses revealed no significant effect of time, menopausal status (MS) or interaction between time and MS on women’s stress perception (ps > .05). There were no significant associations between volume of physical activity and stress perception across time and MS. Yearly trends in the data were observed: at year 2 (where the majority of women were perimenopause), time spent in sedentary behavior was associated with higher levels of stress (r = 0.24, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the change in menopause status had no effect on stress perceptions. Although our analysis revealed no influence of physical activity on stress in this sample of healthy mid-life women, strategies to diminish sedentary time early in the transition to menopause may be worthy of exploration. Additional lifestyle, emotional and psychosocial risk factors of stress should be examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207