MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2464537998 · doi:10.1080/08865655.2016.1195705

Identity Performances in a US–Mexico Border Celebration

2016· article· en· W2464537998 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Diana Carolina Ramos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Borderlands Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Political scienceSociologyGender studiesAestheticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This analysis discusses how individuals living in Laredo, Texas, a city situated in the US–Mexico border region, celebrate and negotiate their identities through experiences in the annual Washington Birthday Celebration (WBC). The study provides insight into how a city that has been identified as the least diverse city in the United States, with 98% of its population being Latino (Lee, Barrett A., John Iceland, and Gregory Sharp. 2012. Racial and Ethnic Diversity Goes Local: Charting change in American Communities over Three Decades. Department of Sociology and Population Research Institute The Pennsylvania State University.) and about 91% of the population speaking Spanish (United States Census Bureau. 2013. Language use in the United States: 2011. [Data file]. http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acs-22.pdf), celebrates US American figures in a patriotic event established in 1898. Through engagement in this celebration, individuals take part in performing and constructing their identities, with physical performances of US American historical figures being afforded only to a select few. In order to answer how the WBC serves as a site for performances and negotiations of identity, the focus of this analysis is on enactments observed in The Society of Martha Washington (SMW) and on the experiences and interpretations of seven focal participants whose social group membership distinguishes how and to what extent they can perform a specific identity. The findings of this study suggest that participants share in their understanding of the manner in which a patriotic event is celebrated through the inclusion of two border cultures, but also illustrate how a particular kind of identity performance is accessible only to some, establishing status differentials in what is meant to be a shared celebration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.415 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Borderlands StudiesSame topicMultilingual Education and PolicyFrench-language works237,207