MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2464702321

Decolonizing Solidarity: Dilemmas and Directions for Supporters of Indigenous Struggles

2016· article· en· W2464702321 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Margaret McKeon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousSolidaritySociologyDecolonizationColonialismGender studiesMedia studiesPolitical scienceLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decolonizing Solidarity: Dilemmas and Directions for Supporters of Indigenous Struggles by Clare Land London: Zed Books, 2015, 324 pages ISBN: 978-1-78360-173-8 (paperback) Decolonization, it can be argued, is the most important ethical challenge within Canadian education today. This book by Clare Land is a highly applicable and welcome resource that has been wanting in Canadian settings and decolonization discourse more generally. From the context of Australian Indigenous activism in which Land has been a long-time non-Indigenous supporter, Decolonizing Solidarity covers the relatively unexplored and important territory of interaction between Indigenous people and non-Indigenous people struggling against both (neo)colonial societal structure and their own interpersonal expressions. Here, Land usefully draws together a broad literature from decolonization and critical whiteness studies with personal reflection and interviews of long-time activists, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous. Land seeks support non-Indigenous people wishing work in solidarity with Indigenous people, and ease the burden of education from Indigenous activists for whom, as Gary Foley of the Gumbaynggirr Nation articulates in his foreword the book, some of the most difficult conversations are with people who have insisted they are supporters of the Aboriginal struggle, not opponents (p. ix). Central the integrity of her work, Land clearly situates herself as a non-Indigenous supporter and subjective participant-researcher, and includes self-reflection showing personal learning. Her research benefits from personal and trusted relationships with key Aboriginal leaders. For me as a non-Indigenous educator and academic with a focus on unsettling colonialism within myself and the world around me, this book is instructive but also changing; reading it challenged my sense of self and understanding of privilege, moving me a new place of being. Following from the premise that the state exists within the self--that the personal is political and political is personal--Land challenges non-Indigenous people to undertake critical self-reflection, commit public political action, and do personal-material work, [that is] change the shape of our lives (p. 233). Some particular tasks that Land puts forward throughout the book for non-Indigenous people interested in solidarity include: * Learn the history of struggles of Indigenous people, particularly those of the area in which you have interest engage (Chapter 2 is offered as example of this history in the context of southeast Australia). * Ask yourself (difficult) questions develop self-understanding of yourself culturally and in relation colonization and privilege, and clarify your motivations work in support of Aboriginal people. * Recognize that the place where you live and work is Aboriginal land. * Be approachable challenge (allowing your perceptions and actions be changed), adopting a stance of active reflection and humility of the learner. * Consider material changes you might make in your life lessen imbalances that are part of your privilege. Helpful and problematic approaches and actions that non-Indigenous supporters can take are well articulated in Chapter 4 Collaboration dialogue and friendship, Chapter 5 Acting politically (and with self reflection), Chapter 6 A moral and political framework for non-Indigenous people's solidarity, and Chapter 7 Reckoning with Complicity. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations166
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207