MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2465207678 · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-505-7_11

Novel Methods for the Investigation of Human Hypertrophic Scarring and Other Dermal Fibrosis

2013· article· en· W2465207678 on OpenAlexafffund
Dariush Honardoust, Peter Kwan, Moein Momtazi, Jie Ding, Edward E. Tredget

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDermisDecorinHypertrophic scarFibrosisWound healingPathologyFibrillogenesisFibroblastKeloidDermal fibroblastMedicineCTGFReticular DermisChemistryAnatomyGrowth factorSurgeryInternal medicineProteoglycanCartilage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypertrophic scar (HTS) represents the dermal equivalent of fibroproliferative disorders that occur after injury involving the deep dermis while superficial wounds to the skin heal with minimal or no scarring. HTS is characterized by progressive deposition of collagen that occurs with high frequency in adult dermal wounds following traumatic or thermal injury. Increased levels of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), decreased expression of small leucine-rich proteoglycans (SLRPs), and/or fibroblast subtypes may influence the development of HTS. The development of HTS is strongly influenced by the cellular and molecular properties of fibroblast subtypes, where cytokines such as fibrotic TGF-β1 and CTGF as well as the expression of SLRPs, particularly decorin and fibromodulin, regulate collagen fibrillogenesis and the activity of TGF-β1. Reduced anti-fibrotic molecules in the ECM of the deep dermis and the distinctive behavior of the fibroblasts in this region of the dermis which display increased sensitivity to TGF-β1's biological activity contribute to the development of HTS following injury to the deep dermis. By comparing the cellular and molecular differences involved in deep and superficial wound healing in an experimental wound scratch model in humans that has both superficial and deep injuries within the same excisional model, our aim is to increase our understanding of how tissue repair following injury to the deep dermis can be changed to promote healing with a similar pattern to healing that occurs following superficial injury that results in no or minimal scarring. Studying the characteristics of superficial dermal injuries that heal with minimal scarring will help us identify therapeutic approaches for tissue engineering and wound healing. In addition, our ability to develop novel therapies for HTS is hampered by limitations in the available animal models used to study this disorder in vivo. We also describe a nude mouse model of transplanted human skin that develops a hypertrophic proliferative scar consistent morphologically and histologically with human HTS, which can be used to test novel treatment options for these dermal fibrotic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicDermatologic Treatments and ResearchFrench-language works237,207