Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures Publication No. 15 (ISPM 15) describes phytosanitary measures to reduce the risk of introduction and/or spread of quarantine pests associated with wood packing materials, including pallets, containers, and dunnage. In 2002, the International Commission on Phytosanitary Measures (ICPM) published ISPM 15, and implementation of the standard began to go into force around the world. However, in October 2004, the European Commission issued Directive 2004/102/EC that, among other things, introduced the concept of requiring wood packaging materials to be debarked. In order to establish an empirical baseline of potential impact of this requirement on North American pallet production, 10 pallet production facilities and three exporting customer facilities were visited in three geographic regions. Based on an inspection of 5,584 pallets in this study, about one in five exhibited at least one occurrence of bark or a bark-like defect, even though 88 percent of the pallets examined were produced from raw material that had been debarked prior to pallet manufacture. Additionally, the study suggests that an appropriate set of inspection criteria and procedures for bark-free wood pallets and crates will be extremely difficult to implement and verify over time in different cultural settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it