MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2465302044 · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0725

A Young Woman With Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation

2016· article· en· W2465302044 on OpenAlexaff
Ashish H. Shah, Diego Delgado, S. Lucy Roche

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Cardiology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineCardiologyPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 18-year-old woman was referred to our adult congenital heart disease center for investigation of chest pain and atrial fibrillation (AF).She had reported intermittent chest pain without precipitating factors since the age of 8 years.This had been evaluated by a pediatric cardiologist and was felt to be noncardiac in nature.Persistence of pain and associated distress eventually prompted referral to adolescent psychiatry.At age 17 years she experienced 3 episodes of AF, each treated with direct-current cardioversion.An electrophysiologist commenced treatment with flecainide and warfarin.Warfarin was stopped after 6 months arrhythmia-free.At our clinic, she reported intermittent, nonexertional, atypical chest pain and exertional dyspnea with a gradual decline in exercise capacity, confirmed by cardiopulmonary exercise test (oxygen consumption peak 65% predicted).Electrocardiogram demonstrated sinus rhythm, a prominent biphasic p-wave, and occasionally prolonged interval between the beginning of the electrocardiographic wave representing ventricular depolarization and the end of the T-wave (QT, QTc up to 594 milliseconds) (Figure 1A).Transthoracic echocardiogram revealed normal ventricular dimensions and systolic function with biatrial dilatation (left > right) (Figure 1B), dilated pulmonary veins, and abnormal diastolic filling.Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium confirmed dilatation of the atria, pulmonary veins, and inferior vena cava with normal ventricular size, mass, and ejection fraction without enhancement suggestive of infarction, inflammation, or fibrosis.Pericardium was of normal thickness.Electrocardiogram A Transthoracic echocardiogram B Figure 1.A, Electrocardiogram demonstrating prominent and biphasic P-wave and ST-T segment abnormalities.B, Four-chamber view of transthoracic echocardiogram.aVF indicates augmented vector foot; aVL indicates augmented vector left arm; and aVR indicates augmented vector right arm.WHAT WOULD YOU DO NEXT? A. Start diuretic, β-blocker, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor B. Start diuretic, implant cardioverter defibrillator, and evaluate for cardiac transplantation C. Discontinue flecainide, start amiodarone and warfarin

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA CardiologySame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207