MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2465845227 · doi:10.1093/gerona/glw114

Dysnatremia in Relation to Frailty and Age in Community-dwelling Adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

2016· article· en· W2465845227 on OpenAlex
Amanda J. Miller, Olga Theou, Miranda McMillan, Susan E. Howlett, Karthik Tennankore, Kenneth Rockwood

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journals of Gerontology Series A · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectrolyte and hormonal disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineFrailty IndexConfidence intervalHypernatremiaNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyHazard ratioHyponatremiaProportional hazards modelGerontologyDemographyInternal medicinePopulationEnvironmental healthSodium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Frailty represents an age-related state of increased risk of adverse health outcomes, reflecting some combination of increased damage and compromised repair processes. Our objectives were to establish whether frailty is associated with dysnatremia (a deviation of serum sodium from normal values), to determine whether frailty explains the previously established association between age and dysnatremia and to assay the impact of each on mortality. Methods: The relationship between age, frailty, and dysnatremia was investigated across the adult life course in 8,911 respondents from the 2003-2004 and 2005-2006 cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, on whom both laboratory and mortality data were available. A frailty index (FI) was calculated for each respondent and related to dysnatremia (serum sodium values outside a 136-144 mmol/L reference range). Results: Dysnatremia was significantly related to both age and frailty; as the degree of frailty increased, so did the proportion with dysnatremia, for example, from 4.1% in those with FI less than 0.10, to 12.4% in those with FI 0.40 or more; p less than .001. Adjusted for frailty, the relationship between age and dysnatremia was no longer significant. In the age- and sex-adjusted Cox models, both frailty (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.05 for every 0.01 increase in FI) and dysnatremia (HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.51-2.26) were significant predictors of mortality; when hyponatremia was separated from hypernatremia in the Cox models, hypernatremia wasn't significant, but only 41 participants were identified as hypernatremic. Conclusion: Increasing frailty is associated with dysnatremia and confounds the association between age and dysnatremia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it