MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Limits on Active to Sterile Neutrino Oscillations from Disappearance Searches in the MINOS, Daya Bay, and Bugey-3 Experiments

2016· article· en· W2466796561 on OpenAlexaff
P. Adamson, Fengpeng An, I. M. Anghel, A. Aurisano, A. B. Balantekin, H. R. Band, G. Barr, M. Bishai, A. Blake, S. Blyth, G. J. Bock, D. Bogert, D. Cao, G. F. Cao, Jun Cao, S. Cao, Timothy J. Carroll, C. M. Castromonte, W. R. Cen, Y. L. Chan, J. F. Chang, Ling-Hua Chang, Y. Chang, H.S. Chen, Q. Y. Chen, R. Chen, Shaomin Chen, Y. Chen, Y. X. Chen, Jie Cheng, Yaping Cheng, Zhaokan Cheng, J. J. Cherwinka, S. Childress, M. C. Chu, A. Chukanov, J. A. B. Coelho, L. A. Corwin, D. Cronin-Hennessy, J. P. Cummings, J. de Arcos, S. De Rijck, Z. Y. Deng, A. V. Devan, N. E. Devenish, Xuefeng Ding, Ying Ding, M. Diwan, M. Dolgareva, J. Dove, D. A. Dwyer, W. R. Edwards, C. O. Escobar, J. J. Evans, E. Falk, G. J. Feldman, W. Flanagan, M. V. Frohne, M. Gabrielyan, H. Gallagher, S. Germani, R. Gill, R. A. Gomes, M. Gonchar, G. Gong, Haipeng Gong, P. Gouffon, N. Graf, R. Gran, M. Grassi, K. Grzelak, W. Gu, Mengyun Guan, Lei Guo, R. P. Guo, Xin-Heng Guo, Ziyi Guo, A. Habig, R. Hackenburg, S. R. Hahn, Ran Han, S. Hans, J. Hartnell, R. Hatcher, M. He, K. M. Heeger, Y. K. Heng, A. Higuera, A. Holin, Y. K. Hor, Y. Hsiung, Beibei Hu, T. Hu, W. Hu, E.-C. Huang, H. X. Huang, J. Huang, X. T. Huang, Patrick Huber, W. Huo, Ghulam Hussain, J. Hylen, G. M. Irwin, Z. Isvan, D. E. Jaffe, P. Jaffke, C. James, K. L. Jen, D. Jensen, S. Jetter, X. L. Ji, X. Ji, J. B. Jiao, Rob Johnson, J. K. de Jong, J. Joshi, T. Kafka, Li-Wei Kang, S. M. S. Kasahara, S. H. Kettell, S. Kohn, G. Koizumi, M. Kordosky, M. Krämer, A. Kreymer, K. K. Kwan, M. W. Kwok, T. Kwok, K. Lang, T. J. Langford, K. Lau, L. Lebanowski, J. Lee, J. H. C. Lee, R. T. Lei, R. Leitner, J. K. C. Leung, C. Li, D. J. Li, F. Li, G. S. Li, Q. J. Li, S. Li, S. C. Li, W. D. Li, X. N. Li, Yufeng Li, Zhibing Li, Han Liang, C.-J. Lin, G. L. Lin, Shengxin Lin, S. Lin, Y. C. Lin, J. J. Ling, J. M. Link, P. J. Litchfield, L. Littenberg, B. R. Littlejohn, D. W. Liu, J. C. Liu, J. L. Liu, T. Lohse, C. Lü, H. Q. Lu, J. S. Lu, P. Lucas, X.-G. Lu, Zhipeng Lv, Q. M., X. B., X. Y., Y. Q., Yury Malyshkin, W. A. Mann, M. L. Marshak, D. A. Martínez Caicedo, N. Mayer, K. T. McDonald, C. L. McGivern, R. D. McKeown, M. M. Medeiros, R. Mehdiyev, J. R. Meier, M. D. Messier, W. H. Miller, S. R. Mishra, I. V. Mitchell, M. Mooney, L. Mualem, J. Musser, Y. Nakajima, D. Naples, J. Napolitano, D. Naumov, E. Naumova, J. K. Nelson, H. B. Newman, H. Y. Ngai, R. J. Nichol, Zhe Ning, J. Nowak, J. Michael O’Connor, J. P. Ochoa‐Ricoux, A. Olshevskiy, M. Orchanian, R. B. Pahlka, J. Paley, H.-R. Pan, J. Park, R. B. Patterson, S. Patton, G. Pawloski, V. Pec, J. C. Peng, A. Perch, M. M. Pfützner, D. D. Phan, S. Phan-Budd, L. Pinsky, R. Plunkett, N. Poonthottathil, C. S. J. Pun, F. Z. Qi, M. Qi, X. Qian, X. Qiu, A. Radovic, N. Raper, B. Rebel, J. Ren, C. Rosenfeld, R. Rosero, B. Roskovec, Xichao Ruan, H. A. Rubin, P. Sail, M. C. Sánchez, J. Schneps, A. Schreckenberger, P. Schreiner, R. Sharma, S. Moed Sher, A. Sousa, H. Steiner, G. X. Sun, Jian Sun, N. Tagg, R. L. Talaga, W. Tang, D. Taychenachev, J. Thomas, M. Thomson, X. C. Tian, A. Timmons, J. Todd, S. C. Tognini, R. Toner, D. Torretta, Konstantin Treskov, K. V. Tsang, C. E. Tull, G. Tzanakos, J. Urheim, P. Vahle, N. Viaux Maira, B. Viren, V. Vorobel, C. Wang, M. Wang, N. Y. Wang, R. G. Wang, Xiang-Gao Wang, Y. F. Wang, Z. Wang, Zhimin Wang, R. Webb, A. Weber, H. Wei, Liangjian Wen, K. Whisnant, C. White, L. Whitehead, T. Wise, S. G. Wojcicki, H. L. H. Wong, S. C. F. Wong, E. Worcester, Chengxin Wu, Q. Wu, W. Wu, D. M. Xia, J. K. Xia, Z. Z. Xing, Jilei Xu, Jing Xu, Y. Xu, T. Xue, Changgen Yang, H. Yang, L. Yang, M. Yang, M. Yang, M. Ye, Ziping Ye, M. Yeh, B. L. Young, Zeyuan Yu, S. Zeng, Liang Zhan, C. Zhang, H. H. Zhang, J. W. Zhang, Qingmin Zhang, X. T. Zhang, Y. M. Zhang, Y. X. Zhang, Z. J. Zhang, Z. P. Zhang, Zhiyong Zhang, J. Zhao, Q. W. Zhao, Y. B. Zhao, W. Zhong, L. Zhou, Nan Zhou, H.L. Zhuang, J. H. Zou

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilChinese Academy of SciencesCAS Center for Excellence in Particle PhysicsCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchChina RailwayConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinnesota Department of Natural ResourcesUniversity of Texas at AustinFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMiniBooNEMINOSSterile neutrinoPhysicsParticle physicsNeutrino oscillationElectron neutrinoNuclear physicsMuonNeutrinoParameter spaceMuon neutrinoMeasurements of neutrino speedMixing (physics)Phase spaceNeutrino detectorSolar neutrino

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Searches for a light sterile neutrino have been performed independently by the MINOS and the Daya Bay experiments using the muon (anti)neutrino and electron antineutrino disappearance channels, respectively. In this Letter, results from both experiments are combined with those from the Bugey-3 reactor neutrino experiment to constrain oscillations into light sterile neutrinos. The three experiments are sensitive to complementary regions of parameter space, enabling the combined analysis to probe regions allowed by the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND) and MiniBooNE experiments in a minimally extended four-neutrino flavor framework. Stringent limits on sin^{2}2θ_{μe} are set over 6 orders of magnitude in the sterile mass-squared splitting Δm_{41}^{2}. The sterile-neutrino mixing phase space allowed by the LSND and MiniBooNE experiments is excluded for Δm_{41}^{2}<0.8 eV^{2} at 95% CL_{s}.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207