MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466880357 · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/2/3/035022

Scatter point models for breast cone-beam computed tomography: preliminary study

2016· article· en· W2466880357 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Physics & Engineering Express · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCone beam computed tomographyPoint (geometry)Computed tomographyCone (formal languages)TomographyOpticsFocal pointBeam (structure)PhysicsComputer scienceMedicineRadiologyGeometryMathematicsAlgorithmCardinal point

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulations with a single scatter point per incident beamlet (SSP) model applied to homogeneous phantoms could provide scatter signals that can be subtracted from cone beam breast CT projections so as to minimize the effects caused by scattered photons. Consider a heterogeneous 14 cm diameter 10.5 cm long cylindrical fat cylinder with 5 embedded cylinders of fibroglandular (fib) such that the percent volume of fib is 15%. A 60 kV beam delivering a total dose of 7 mGy over 300 projections was used for interrogation. A transmission model and a many scattering point per incident beamlet (MSP) model incorporating a scattering point every 1 cm of depth of beamlet were used to estimate the energy integrated signals (EIS) due to primary (p) and single scattered (s) photons on each pixel. These models were also used to calculate the EIS p and EIS s for a homogeneous phantom of the same size and fib:fat mass fractions. The SSP model was then applied with the scatter point of interaction being at a depth = d k × δ where d k = length of beamlet k in the phantom and δ was found by matching its peak scatter-to-primary ratio with that obtained with the MSP homogeneous model. The SSP was tested to correct for the effects of the single scatter during cone beam CT of the heterogeneous phantom. The Hounsfield unit deviations from the ideal primary for fib and fat were −95.1 and −56 via no correction for scatter whereas with correction they were 3.8 and −2. It was encouraging to see how a simple model could minimize the effects of single scattered photons during a cone beam CT imaging task. The preliminary findings encourage further efforts for thoroughly testing its applicability for obtaining higher quality images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it