MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2466897053 · doi:10.1021/ja710451s

Site-Selective sp<sup>2</sup> and Benzylic sp<sup>3</sup> Palladium-Catalyzed Direct Arylation

2008· article· en· W2466897053 on OpenAlexaff
Louis‐Charles Campeau, Derek J. Schipper, Keith Fagnou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPalladiumSelectivityDiazineCatalysisLigand (biochemistry)Yield (engineering)Combinatorial chemistryAzineMoleculeStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palladium-catalyzed site selective arylation reactions of both sp 2 and benzylic sp 3 sites on azine and diazine N -oxide substrates are described that occur in good to excellent yield and with complete selectivity for reaction at the desired position. These studies have uncovered the need to properly control the metal to ligand ratio in sp 2 arylation and necessitated a complete reinvestigation of all reaction parameters for sp 3 arylation. From these studies, the choice of base emerged as a pivotal component for site selectivity, pointing to its intimate involvement in the mechanism of direct arylation. These site selective reactions have been validated in both divergent and sequential derivatizations of heterocyclic compounds represent an attractive alternative to other routes to this class of molecule.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations354
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicCatalytic C–H Functionalization MethodsFrench-language works237,207