MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2467021779 · doi:10.14740/wjnu249w

Prostatic Leiomyoma With Bizarre Nuclei: A Case Report

2016· article· en· W2467021779 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vibeke M. Kristensen, Anand C. Loya, Klaus Brasso

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Nephrology and Urology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrologic and reproductive health conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLower urinary tract symptomsHyperplasiaProstatePresentation (obstetrics)UrologyLeiomyomaCase presentationResectionGynecologySurgeryPathologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leiomyoma with bizarre nuclei (LM-BN) is a very rare finding which cannot be distinguished clinically from the very commonly occurring benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). If correctly diagnosed, LM-BN has a favorable prognosis after complete surgical excision. It is important to keep this alternative diagnosis in mind when treating a patient with complaints indicating prostatic hyperplasia. This case involves a 77-year-old male presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms; based on clinical presentation, the patient was diagnosed with BPH. A transurethral prostate resection was performed. Resected prostate tissue was collected for analysis and diagnosis of prostatic LM-BN was made. World J Nephrol Urol. 2016;5(2):37-39 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu249w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Nephrology and UrologySame topicUrologic and reproductive health conditionsFrench-language works237,207