MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2467451464 · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.10523

Association of multiparametric MRI quantitative imaging features with prostate cancer gene expression in MRI-targeted prostate biopsies

2016· article· en· W2467451464 on OpenAlexaffabout
Radka Stoyanova, Alan Pollack, Mandeep Takhar, Charles M. Lynne, Nestor A. Parra, Lucia L.C. Lam, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Christine Buerki, Rosa Castillo, Mercè Jordà, Hussam Al-Deen Ashab, Oleksandr N. Kryvenko, Sanoj Punnen, Dipen J. Parekh, Matthew C. Abramowitz, Robert J. Gillies, Elai Davicioni, Nicholas Erho, Adrian Ishkanian

Bibliographic record

VenueOncotarget · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsGenome British Columbia
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMiamiProstate cancerRadiogenomicsMedicineCancerOncologyInternal medicinePathologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

// Radka Stoyanova 1 , Alan Pollack 1 , Mandeep Takhar 2 , Charles Lynne 3 , Nestor Parra 1 , Lucia L.C. Lam 2 , Mohammed Alshalalfa 2 , Christine Buerki 2 , Rosa Castillo 4 , Merce Jorda 3, 5 , Hussam Al-deen Ashab 2 , Oleksandr N. Kryvenko 3, 5 , Sanoj Punnen 3 , Dipen J. Parekh 3 , Matthew C. Abramowitz 1 , Robert J. Gillies 6 , Elai Davicioni 2 , Nicholas Erho 2 , Adrian Ishkanian 1 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA 2 Reserach and Development, GenomeDx Biosciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada 3 Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA 4 Department of Radiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA 6 Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA Correspondence to: Radka Stoyanova, email: rstoyanova@med.miami.edu Keywords: prostate cancer, multiparametric MRI, MRI-targeted biopsies, gene expression, radiogenomics Received: February 26, 2016      Accepted: June 30, 2016      Published: July 11, 2016 ABSTRACT Standard clinicopathological variables are inadequate for optimal management of prostate cancer patients. While genomic classifiers have improved patient risk classification, the multifocality and heterogeneity of prostate cancer can confound pre-treatment assessment. The objective was to investigate the association of multiparametric (mp)MRI quantitative features with prostate cancer risk gene expression profiles in mpMRI-guided biopsies tissues. Global gene expression profiles were generated from 17 mpMRI-directed diagnostic prostate biopsies using an Affimetrix platform. Spatially distinct imaging areas (‘habitats’) were identified on MRI/3D-Ultrasound fusion. Radiomic features were extracted from biopsy regions and normal appearing tissues. We correlated 49 radiomic features with three clinically available gene signatures associated with adverse outcome. The signatures contain genes that are over-expressed in aggressive prostate cancers and genes that are under-expressed in aggressive prostate cancers. There were significant correlations between these genes and quantitative imaging features, indicating the presence of prostate cancer prognostic signal in the radiomic features. Strong associations were also found between the radiomic features and significantly expressed genes. Gene ontology analysis identified specific radiomic features associated with immune/inflammatory response, metabolism, cell and biological adhesion. To our knowledge, this is the first study to correlate radiogenomic parameters with prostate cancer in men with MRI-guided biopsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations106
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncotargetSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207