MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2467668825

[Using titanium cerclage band to teat intra- and post-operative femoral fracture in total hip arthroplasty].

2012· article· en· W2467668825 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hu Li, Wei Wei, Jianhao Lin, Bolong Kou

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryTotal hip arthroplastyArthroplasty
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the treatment and clinical result of using titanium cerclage band to teat intra- and post-operative femoral fracture in total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: From August 1999 to September 2007, twenty-two patients who suffered from intra-and post-operative femoral oblique fracture in total hip arthroplasty were reviewed among 2186 consecutive total hip arthroplasty patients performed by one surgeon. There were 12 fractures occurred intraoperative and 10 fractures postoperative. There are 9 primary and 13 revision total hip arthroplasty patients including 10 men and 12 women. All fractures are classified as Vancouver B1 type in 15 cases and B2 type in 7 cases. Two to five titanium cerclage bands had been used to fix the fracture followed by open reduction with 13 cases using 2 cerclage bands and 7 cases using 3 bands and 1 case using 4 bands and 1 case using 5 bands. Whether change the original stem or not depended on the classification of fractures and stability of stems. There were 15 cases of type B1 and 1 case of type B2 without changing stems and 6 cases of type B2 changing to revision stems of the same series of original stems. RESULTS: All fractures showed successfully union for 12 - 20 weeks (average 18 weeks) after operation. The average Harris score of the hip improved to 90 points (80 to 95 points) at an average 6.5 years follow-up (4 to 11 years) and the average range of motion of the hip got to 120° (105° - 135°). Femoral prostheses were well-fixed without any subsidence or lucent lines or loosening. All patients were satisfied with the results with well-fixed and good alignment of femoral stem. CONCLUSIONS: Strong fixation of the fractures and good initial stability of femoral stem can be obtained using titanium cerclage bands to fix the intra- and post-operative femoral oblique fracture. Original stems should be changed to revision stems in case of type B2 and be retained in case of type B1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→