Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering, Montreal, Canada, 4-8 May 2015 / Philippe Kruchten, Steffen Becker, Jean-Guy Schneider (eds.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is our great pleasure to welcome you to the 18th International ACM Sigsoft Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering -- CBSE'15. This year's symposium continues its tradition of being the premier forum for presentation of research results and experience reports in component technology. The general theme for CBSE'15 is 'Components for physical services', motivated by the fact that software systems increasingly control processes that reside outside traditional computing environments. The call for papers attracted 42 submissions from around the globe: America (Brazil, Canada, Jamaica, USA), Asia (India, Pakistan), Europe (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom), and Oceania (Australia, New Zealand), highlighting the international appeal of the event. The papers in these proceedings are included based on a formal peer-reviewing process on full papers. Each submission was reviewed by at least three independent members of the Program Committee. After an extensive discussion, the Program Committee decided to accept 14 papers (9 regular papers and 5 short papers). It is very pleasing to see that the accepted papers cover a variety of topics, including Component Composition and Reuse, Adaptable Components, Components for Wireless and Realtime systems, Component Analysis and Design, and Components in Model-based Engineering. To a certain degree, this reflects on the progress component technologies have made over the past years. We hope that the CBSE'15 proceedings will serve as a reference for academic researchers and practitioners working in the area of Component-Based Software Engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".