TH‐AB‐BRA‐03: Backscatter Dose Factors Re‐Evaluated for Inhomogeneities in the Presence of a 1.5 T Magnetic Field Using the GPUMCD Monte Carlo Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the backscatter dose factors near the interfaces for clinically relevant high atomic number materials using GPUMCD for the Elekta MRI Linac. Methods: Backscatter dose factors (BSDF) were calculated as the ratio of the dose with and without the presence of the heterogeneity. The BSDF's were calculated either in the absence or presence of an orthogonal 1.5 T magnetic field. Doses were scored in small voxels of side 1 mm in a water phantom with dimensions of 20×20×20 cm using GPUMCD (Elekta). The minimum uncertainty in dose calculations was kept to 0.5%. A slab of thickness 2 cm, representing the inhomogeneity, was placed inside the phantom with variable position from the surface of the phantom. The slab was filled with either bone, aluminum, titanium, stainless steel, or dental amalgam. The phantom was irradiated using particles sampled from a histogram which represented the true MRI Linac spectrum. Results: With the application of the 1.5 T magnetic field (B‐On), all of the BSDF's were reduced by at least 8% compared to the no magnetic field (B‐Off) cases. For the B‐Off case, the BSDF decreases exponentially with the upstream distance away from the interface. With B‐On, the BSDF decreases exponentially for titanium, SS, and amalgam. However, it remains constant for Aluminum. In the case of bone, the BSDF increases up to a distance of 4 mm away from the interface in the presence of the magnetic field. Conclusion: The BSDF does not depend upon the thickness of the homogeneous material above the inhomogeneity for either the B‐Off or B‐On cases. For all the materials investigated, the BSDF is lower at the interface for the B‐On case. The exponential fall‐off of the BSDF away from the interface is not valid for all the materials when the magnetic field is turned ON. Funding support for this research was provided by Elekta
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".