MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468034169

Returning to the Kaswéntah River: A Trans-Indigenous Reading of Land-Centred Citizenship in Thomas King’s Truth and Bright Water

2015· article· en· W2468034169 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kaitlin Debicki

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousCitizenshipPsychological nativismColonialismSociologyLawEnvironmental ethicsPolitical sciencePoliticsEcologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a trans-Indigenous methodology to read Thomas King’s novel Truth and Bright Water through the frame of the Hodinohso:ni Aterihwahnira:tshera ne Kaswentah (Two Row Wampum), this paper argues that difference and division – between peoples, races, and nations – can still support an inclusive citizenship based upon our shared interdependence with the Earth. Through the novel’s side-by-side positioning of Indigenous and Settler spaces, and characters’ struggles navigating across these spaces, I explore both the possibility of unification based upon shared ecology, and the current barriers to such a possibility wrought by colonialism’s disruption of Indigenous landed relationships. Juxtaposed next to the principles and protocols of the Two Row Wampum, the novel highlights colonialism’s disruption of Indigenous land-centrism as a consequence of Settler failure to follow the conduct of sharing and difference outlined by that agreement. As such, I look at the attempted annihilation of the buffalo, the enforcement of Christianity, the theft of Indigenous artifacts and remains, and profit motivated acts of ecocide as examples in the novel of Settler interference in landed citizenship. I then consider Monroe Swimmer as an Elder Brother figure who champions landed citizenship by engaging the people of Truth and Bright Water in land-centred ceremonies that combine both Indigenous and Settler cultures. Monroe demonstrates how knowing your relations and carrying the land in your centre enables movement back and forth across both material markers of difference, such as national and reservation borders, and cognitive ones, such as binaries of nativism or assimilation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207