MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468155677 · doi:10.1287/trsc.2015.0634

Reformulations by Discretization for Piecewise Linear Integer Multicommodity Network Flow Problems

2016· article· en· W2468155677 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationMathematical optimizationInteger programmingFlow networkLagrangian relaxationMulti-commodity flow problemPiecewise linear functionMathematicsFlow (mathematics)Linear programming relaxationRelaxation (psychology)Integer (computer science)Linear programmingConstraint (computer-aided design)Set (abstract data type)Branch and cutComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the piecewise linear multicommodity network flow problem with the addition of a constraint specifying that the total flow on each arc must be an integer. This problem has applications in transportation and logistics, where total flows might represent vehicles or containers filled with different products. We introduce formulations that exploit this integrality constraint by adapting to our problem a technique known as discretization that has been used to derive mixed-integer programming models for several combinatorial optimization problems. We enhance the discretized models either by adding valid inequalities derived from cut-set inequalities or by using flow disaggregation techniques. Since the size of the formulations derived from discretization and flow disaggregation rapidly increases with problem dimensions, we develop an efficient and effective Lagrangian relaxation method to compute lower and upper bounds. We perform computational results on a large set of randomly generated instances that allow us to compare the relative efficiency of the different modeling alternatives (flow disaggregation plus addition of cut-set inequalities with or without discretization), when used within the Lagrangian relaxation approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it