MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468333385 · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2016.2584978

A Ring-Based 25 Gb/s DAC-Less PAM-4 Modulator

2016· article· en· W2468333385 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammed Shafiqul Hai, Monireh Moayedi Pour Fard, Odile Liboiron-Ladouceur

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsBandwidth (computing)Electro-optic modulatorResonatorInterferometryPhase modulationComputer scienceOptoelectronicsOpticsOptical modulatorTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel PAM-4 12.5 Gbaud/s inter-coupling modulator based on a Mach-Zehnder interferometer assisted ring resonator is demonstrated. The 25 Gb/s PAM-4 optical signal is generated by driving the modulator with two independent electrical signals with an amplitude of 3 V <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">pp</sub> at 2 V reverse bias. Reverse bias operation mode of the modulator enables achieving an electro-optic (EO) bandwidth of approximately 14 GHz without preemphasis of the electrical driving signals or equalization techniques. This configuration successfully simplifies the operation of the modulator in generating PAM-4 signals without the need for a digital-to-analog converter (DAC). Experimental results show proper generation of a PRBS data stream. The proposed modulator has a compact footprint of 0.48 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> with a bandwidth density of 52.08 Gb/s/mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum ElectronicsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207