Temporary Iliac Fixation to Salvage an Acute L4 Chance Fracture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A case report. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe a technique of temporary distal fixation to the ilium to salvage an acute L4 fracture following a T3-L4 kyphoscoliosis correction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle fracture is a possible complication in pedicle screw fixation for scoliosis, which may lead to postoperative instability, resulting in loss of fixation and pseudoarthrosis. This report highlights the salvage treatment of a chance fracture that occurred in the lower instrumented vertebra following deformity correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) without sacrificing further distal motion segments. METHODS: A retrospective chart and radiograph review of a 13-year-old female who underwent surgical treatment for correction of AIS was performed. RESULTS: Following a T3-L4 correction with apical posterior column releases, an L4 Chance fracture with loss of distal fixation occurred on post-op day 3. Following an unsuccessful salvage with an infralaminar hook, a second revision was performed replacing the hook and adding bilateral temporary fixation to the ilium connected to the distal ends of the main rods through side-to-side connectors. The temporary fixation was removed 6 months later with successful healing of the fracture maintenance of the scoliosis correction at 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Temporary extension of the construct to the ilium was successfully utilized in this case to salvage an acute L4 Chance fracture that occurred following a T3 to L4 construct for kyphoscoliosis. With this technique, successful reduction and healing of the fracture occurred with maintenance of the deformity correction without the need to fuse further distal segments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".