Effects of training set selection on pain recognition via facial expressions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an approach to pain expression classification based on Gabor energy filters with Support Vector Machines (SVMs), followed by analyzing the effects of training set variations on the systems classification rate. This approach is tested on the UNBC-McMaster Shoulder Pain Archive, which consists of spontaneous pain images, hand labelled using the Prkachin and Solomon Pain Intensity scale. In this paper, the subjects pain intensity level has been quantized into three disjoint groups: no pain, weak pain and strong pain. The results of experiments show that Gabor energy filters with SVMs provide comparable or better results to previous filter- based pain recognition methods, with precision rates of 74%, 30% and 78% for no pain, weak pain and strong pain, respectively. The study of effects of intra-class skew, or changing the number of images per subject, show that both completely removing and over-representing poor quality subjects in the training set has little effect on the overall accuracy of the system. This result suggests that poor quality subjects could be removed from the training set to save offline training time and that SVM is robust not only to outliers in training data, but also to significant amounts of poor quality data mixed into the training sets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".