MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468660500 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612695.001

Preface and acknowledgements

2000· book-chapter· en· W2468660500 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Testing and Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Natural (archaeology)Cover (algebra)Field (mathematics)EpistemologyPsychologyHistoryEngineeringPhilosophyMathematicsMedicineMechanical engineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I wrote this book as a text for intermediate and advanced level courses in motivation, and as supplementary material for courses on comparative psychology and biopsychology. Although there may be overlap with material in other current textbooks on motivation, the approach and treatment taken in this one is quite different. It does not present an exhaustive review of facts and anthology of theories in the field, but instead, attempts to cover selected material linked in a coherent fashion. In doing so I have attempted to make some sense of the diverse range of topics that are covered in other motivation texts. I have also attempted to indicate the interplay of material on animal and human research, and hope that the reader will find the presentation a natural one in which the transition between the two appears unforced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it