Oral dosing requirements for phenytoin in the first three months of life.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Historically, physicians have been reluctant to maintain infants on phenytoin (PHT) following initial stabilization with intravenous loading doses, as therapeutic blood levels are difficult to achieve with conventional oral doses, and there is concern that high doses will result in toxicity. OBJECTIVES: To determine the oral dose of PHT required to achieve therapeutic blood concentrations, without clinical toxicity, in the first weeks of life. METHODS: Eight infants with seizures were treated with phenytoin from 2 weeks to 3 months of age. Total and free phenytoin concentrations, and urine phenytoin metabolite (p-hydroxyphenytoin) were measured every 2 weeks. Parents were asked to note seizure frequency and complete a questionnaire about possible side effects every 2 weeks. RESULTS: No infants had seizures and no clinical side effects were noted. Doses required to achieve therapeutic serum concentrations ranged from 10-20mg/kg/day, considerably higher than doses required in adults. Free phenytoin levels were 8-13% of total serum concentrations, similar to ratios reported in adults. CONCLUSION: To achieve therapeutic serum phenytoin levels in infants, doses of 10-20 mg/kg/day are required. These higher doses can be safely administered without clinical toxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".