MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468703754 · doi:10.1061/9780784479957.153

Large-Diameter, Non-Circular Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Using GRP Composites

2016· article· en· W2468703754 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegAecom (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibre-reinforced plasticPipeline transportConstructabilityRehabilitationBrickMaterials scienceComposite materialCivil engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reviews the preliminary design, detailed design and rehabilitation of two large diameter non-circular trunk sewers in Winnipeg Manitoba, Canada. The existing egg shaped, combined sewer trunks were constructed from brick and cast-in-place concrete with sizes of 2030 mm high x 1630 mm wide and 2980 mm high x 1980 mm wide, respectively. The original construction of the oldest pipe (the 2030 mm high egg) dates back to the 1880’s. Previous condition assessment programs highlighted significant deterioration of the pipelines including loss of invert in the concrete host pipe and reverse curvature at the crown in the brick sewer. Given their size and hydraulic significance, their rehabilitation was a high priority in the overall sewer condition upgrading program. A number of rehabilitation methods were considered as part of the preliminary design process, including segmental lining with glass reinforced polymer (GRP) composites, cured-in-place pipe (CIPP), spiral wound PVC, and bonded glass and carbon fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) systems. Each lining product/system was reviewed for its long term structural performance, constructability, quality assurance requirements, flow bypass requirements during installation, and the capital and life cycle costs of the rehabilitation. While a majority of the products reviewed had a long performance history, hand applied, bonded FRP liners are a relatively new concept and required considerable development of non-traditional rehabilitation design concepts. Bonded FRP’s have been deployed successfully in the water market in recent years on critical pipelines; however, the protocol to assess their viability for gravity sewer applications required development to facilitate consideration as an alternative to more traditional rehabilitation technologies. The introduction of multiple competitive alternatives for rehabilitation of pipelines of this size is complex and in this case delivered significant financial benefits to the owner. The paper reviews the preliminary and detailed design process, the procurement process used to assess equal but very different designs and the eventual implementation of the successful alternative, a segmental GRP liner, to deliver a new design life to these two critical sewer elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it