MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468846530 · doi:10.1049/iet-smt.2016.0168

Energy conservation‐based thresholding for effective wavelet denoising of partial discharge signals

2016· article· en· W2468846530 on OpenAlexaff
Ramy Hussein, Khaled Shaban, Ayman El‐Hag

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Science Measurement & Technology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersQatar National Research Fund
KeywordsThresholdingNoise reductionWaveletPartial dischargeEnergy (signal processing)Energy conservationComputer scienceWavelet transformArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsEngineeringStatisticsElectrical engineeringImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies have shown that wavelet transform can effectively be used for noise reduction in the context of partial discharge (PD) signal detection and classification. Several thresholding approaches for wavelet denoising have been reported in the literature. In this study, a novel wavelet threshold estimation method, named energy conservation‐based thresholding (ECBT), is introduced. The proposed thresholding function is capable of conserving a significant portion of the original signal energy, while the threshold value is determined based on the relative difference between the original and noisy signal energies. The proposed method is first applied to PD signals contaminated with different levels of simulated noise. Results show that ECBT produces a denoised PD signal with higher signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and less distortion than PDs produced by the existing wavelet methods. Then, ECBT is modified to address actual PD signals corrupted with real noise, where a robust SNR estimation method is derived to estimate the noise level embedded in the measured PD signals. The denoised PD signals indicate that the proposed method yields higher reduction in noise levels than other methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Science Measurement & TechnologySame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207